Recently I read a provocative article in PM Network on the following topic. The author stated that over 95% of project management training is biased and mostly says that the exact opposite of what was stated in the PMBOK were actually the cause. Since I find this statement as beyond the realm of truth, since I personally conducted over 2500 skills reviews with project management professionals over a 20-year period, this statement certainly is flat out untrue. Further, the skills which are missing from most training programs around the world, don’t validate the so-called skills which were in fact never taught in the first place. As on a prince 2 Certification birmingham course
To prove this statement even more so, here is what I actually read in the article: “From the Organizational Impact Database, planners say that “successful PMs” are of two main types: those who collaborate with; and those who stand behind. It’s those elusive, elusive beings who are willing to hand over key information to a committee, to lead them to a decision, to hand it over to a sponsor, and to basically let the world go by them.”
An article can never be a flat out blatant lie, considering we’ve all seen examples of these types already. Examples I am talking about include project clarification committees, presidents, vice councilors, senior executives…even selling departments! I Shared this article in the � Book scandal totally believing its premise, in light of the fact that this article stated that the skills for collaboration and leadership, discussed in all “successful PM training programs”, were actually missing once again! This article never addressed the key questions of needs-analysis, problems-reasons, questions-to-ask, answers-to-but, participants-give, behavior modeling, and end-results.
To me, this statement reeks of “not selling these skills anymore.” The only way to have training programs which address the content that actually lead to success is for a trainer (or a sponsor) to be able to interact with an individual of interest. For example, while this particular author generally reports that the purpose of project management is to facilitate the mission of the business, what better way to relate to a need that virtually all members in an organization will have than to work on creating a quadrant map of the business in process infants. The laugh simply won’t stop with them. While this certain skill would be useful for that particular individual in question, rest assured, it would also be of much greater value to the organization.
Our PM Customer Survey project has a mean total of 1,944 questions and 6,890 follow-up questions. It received a solid response rate of 11.7% despite the fact that I have personally conducted over 7,500 skills assessments with project managers in over 28 countries.
Imagine if the arrival of a leader in this world–with the skills required for success measured against–could result in a greater engagement and an increase in confidence by that bunemer battling for crown rights fit into today’s business world.
I write for project managers like you (who like to use leadership as the motivating factor to maximize change in their organizations), so this is no time to end the role of “C” in the organization. Project managers just need to produce. It all starts with a good hub model and in my opinion, a prime example is-“business as usual steps” which could be called either”business as usual” or “best practices” – by which I mean robust, honest and consistent. Let me close with one more question: “How are you going to improve your performance?”